@article {bnh-7907, title = {High-Resolution Estimates of Fire Severity - An Evaluation of UAS Image and LiDAR Mapping Approaches on a Sedgeland Forest Boundary in Tasmania, Australia }, journal = {Fire}, volume = {4}, year = {2021}, month = {03/2021}, chapter = {14}, abstract = {

With an increase in the frequency and severity of wildfires across the globe and resultant changes to long-established fire regimes, the mapping of fire severity is a vital part of monitoring ecosystem resilience and recovery. The emergence of unoccupied aircraft systems (UAS) and compact sensors (RGB and LiDAR) provide new opportunities to map fire severity. This paper conducts a comparison of metrics derived from UAS Light Detecting and Ranging (LiDAR) point clouds and UAS image based products to classify fire severity. A workflow which derives novel metrics describing vegetation structure and fire severity from UAS remote sensing data is developed that fully utilises the vegetation information available in both data sources. UAS imagery and LiDAR data were captured pre- and post-fire over a 300 m by 300 m study area in Tasmania, Australia. The study area featured a vegetation gradient from sedgeland vegetation (e.g., button grass 0.2m) to forest (e.g., Eucalyptus obliqua and Eucalyptus globulus 50m). To classify the vegetation and fire severity, a comprehensive set of variables describing structural, textural and spectral characteristics were gathered using UAS images and UAS LiDAR datasets. A recursive feature elimination process was used to highlight the subsets of variables to be included in random forest classifiers. The classifier was then used to map vegetation and severity across the study area. The results indicate that UAS LiDAR provided similar overall accuracy to UAS image and combined (UAS LiDAR and UAS image predictor values) data streams to classify vegetation (UAS image: 80.6\%; UAS LiDAR: 78.9\%; and Combined: 83.1\%) and severity in areas of forest (UAS image: 76.6\%, UAS LiDAR: 74.5\%; and Combined: 78.5\%) and areas of sedgeland (UAS image: 72.4\%; UAS LiDAR: 75.2\%; and Combined: 76.6\%). These results indicate that UAS SfM and LiDAR point clouds can be used to assess fire severity at very high spatial resolutio

}, keywords = {3D remote sensing, drone, fire severity, fuel structure, Lidar, photogrammetry, RPAS, structure, UAS, vegetation}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/fire4010014}, url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2571-6255/4/1/14/htm}, author = {Samuel Hillman and Bryan Hally and Luke Wallace and Darren Turner and Arko Lucieer and Karin Reinke and Simon Jones} } @article {bnh-6222, title = {A Method for Validating the Structural Completeness of Understory Vegetation Models Captured with 3D Remote Sensing}, journal = {Remote Sensing}, volume = {11}, year = {2019}, month = {09/2019}, abstract = {

Characteristics describing below canopy vegetation are important for a range of forest ecosystem applications including wildlife habitat, fuel hazard and fire behaviour modelling, understanding forest recovery after disturbance and competition dynamics. Such applications all rely on accurate measures of vegetation structure. Inherent in this is the assumption or ability to demonstrate measurement accuracy. 3D point clouds are being increasingly used to describe vegetated environments, however limited research has been conducted to validate the information content of terrestrial point clouds of understory vegetation. This paper describes the design and use of a field frame to co-register point intercept measurements with point cloud data to act as a validation source. Validation results show high correlation of point matching in forests with understory vegetation elements with large mass and/or surface area, typically consisting of broad leaves, twigs and bark 0.02 m diameter or greater in size (SfM, MCC 0.51{\textendash}0.66; TLS, MCC 0.37{\textendash}0.47). In contrast, complex environments with understory vegetation elements with low mass and low surface area showed lower correlations between validation measurements and point clouds (SfM, MCC 0.40 and 0.42; TLS, MCC 0.25 and 0.16). The results of this study demonstrate that the validation frame provides a suitable method for comparing the relative performance of different point cloud generation processes

}, keywords = {3D remote sensing, biomass, forest measurement, structure from motion, terrestrial laser scanning, validation, vegetation structure}, doi = {https://doi.org/10.3390/rs11182118}, url = {https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/11/18/2118}, author = {Samuel Hillman and Luke Wallace and Karin Reinke and Bryan Hally and Simon Jones and Daisy Saldias} }